|
Opening Opinions: Her actions are Vicious, Ugly, Repelling. Unsolicited response. (New Mexico researcher ) A vote for Karen Mitchell is a vote for corruption. (Charles Barnum, 2004 National Campaign.) Charlie, I recommend that you do not respond. This may
result in your being expelled from USGenWeb. State Coordinators
can't be expelled but County Coordinators can. In a web page (discovered 28 March 2007), Susan Bellomo, then the
State Coordinator of NMGenWeb, told members
Harold Kilmer and Pat Bennett that after the election, it would be
Open Season on Charles Barnum. That is exactly what happened:
A staged flare-up about Barnum not subscribing to the
email list; Personal attacks against Barnum on the NMGenWeb e-mail
list, the expulsion of Barnum from NMGenWeb without charges, and
five
pages of online filth by Karen Mitchell; and 70 alleged anonymous statements coming from the
participating County Coordinators of NMGenWeb when in fact there
were only 15 CCs at that time. This was followed by a
slanderous attack on Barnum's Mother, his Children and his
Grandchildren. Quote:
Crime of Conspiracy: Does this Conspiracy rise to the level of a Crime by the Officers of NMGenWeb? Do the five web pages Karen Mitchell wrote show a conspiracy to harm by slander supporting the the Open Season on Barnum? You decide. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: Conspiracy (crime) As you read the following, decide for yourself if the Open Season on Barnum by slander and lies is a criminal act. During the 2004 Elections for the Position of National Coordinator (of USGenWeb), Barnum believed that electing Karen Mitchell to head USGenWeb would be a disaster. Karen Mitchell subsequently lost that election by a wide margin. In 2006, after Karen Mitchell whipped the membership of NMGenWeb into a frothing frenzy, she expelled Charles Barnum from NMGenWeb on unspecified charges. Her tactics were vulgar, baiting, hearsay, dehumanizing battering, demonizing, half lies, lies, slander, anonymous testimony, slander by proxy, and character assignation--not only toward Barnum but toward his ninety year old Mother, and toward his children and their children. Karen Mitchell is at her best when slandering and scheming. How much more corrupt would she have been if she won the election for the top position in USGenWeb? Karen Mitchell denied a hearing for Barnum. That is a fundamental right in all organizations. It's the foundation of justice in America. The fact that Karen Mitchell was able to operate with a contempt for justice is a manifestation of online genealogy in NMGenWeb. Crime of CYBER
STALKING:
NRS 200.575 Stalking:
Definitions:
1. A person who, without lawful authority, willfully or maliciously engages in a course of conduct that would cause a reasonable person to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated or harassed, and that actually causes the victim to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated or harassed, commits the crime of stalking. Karen Mitchell stated or implied on the
Internet that,
Fact: C. W. Barnum has never violated a Bylaw of USGenWeb.
|
Prolog
"In a somewhat related note, we hear through the
grapevine that the Board has finally turned it's attention to the
grievance filed by Charles Barnum TEN months ago after Karen
Mitchell booted him out of NMGenWeb. Ten months!! Justice delayed is
justice denied. Link: http://dailyboardshow.blogspot.com/2007_04_01_archive.html
|
You may
wish to skip to
Smear Merchants and
Filth and Lies
to read the best filth Karen
Mitchell published.
Open Season <>
Raping Barnum <>
Smear Merchants
Phony Votes <>
Filth and Lies <>
Parting Filth
Links to
Secret
trials and related
Bonus pages:
Satanic Verses Forbidden Fruit
The Horror, the Horror
FREELOADERS AND WHINING MOOCHERS?
Search this site //\\ CC Help
Page
TO SEND FEEDBACK PLEASE
CLICK HERE
UPDATE: 25 July 2007
1:PM: Karen Mitchell filed a Police Report with the Pueblo
County
Colorado Sheriff's Office against Barnum according to a phone call from
that department.
A copy of
that Police report has been requested under the Colorado Information laws
for publication herein.
Colorado Stalking Law
~ Filing False Police Reports
In July 2007 Karen Mitchell admitted she did not follow the rules. Karen Mitchell wrote:
"I'm sorry Don, but when you put the Bylaws and Sturgis ahead of a "majortiy"
(sic) of
the membership involved, you're going to have problems. If we were paid for what
we do that wouldn't be the case, but we are all Volunteers." --Karen Mitchell,
who apparently doesn't understand the purpose of bylaws OR Sturgis, USGENWEB-SW
(Copied from the DBS News Blog 14 July 2007.)
Notice to visitors. This web site is not directed at a specific person. Karen Mitchell is forbidden to read this web site. Colorado Stalking law reads in part: (h) Repeatedly insults, taunts, challenges, or makes communications in offensively coarse language to another in a manner likely to provoke a violent or disorderly response. No person is forced to read this web. It's for the general public, except that Karen Mitchell is not invited to view its contents. No communication is made to Karen Mitchell herein. Karen Mitchell stated to the Pueblo County Sheriff's office, according to them, that she does not want to be contacted by telephone, nor by letter, nor by email, nor in person. So do not read these Truths, KM. More than 800 typed pages are presented about the secret trial of Stowell. Only five pages are devoted to Karen's lies. This is not all about Mitchell as she claimed to the Colorado Sherriff's Office. She also claimed that this site was about USGenWeb,* not about her in a published post. Which is it, Your Majesty? All about you or about USGenWeb? Liars always get caught in their own web. *"But if you read it you can clearly see its (sic) about the Project." Karen Mitchell. 12 Jun 2007 USGenWeb Discuss List.
General Disclaimer Dedication of site DBS Archives History of USGenWeb
©2007 image: credit unknown